[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1549613335-30319-7-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:08:50 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] mtd: rawnand: denali: use more precise timeout for NAND_OP_WAITRDT_INSTR
Currently, wait_for_completion_timeout() is always passed in the
hard-coded msec_to_jiffies(1000). There is no specific reason for
1000 msec, but I just chose it long enough.
With the exec_op() conversion, NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR provides more
precise timeout value, depending on the preceding command. Let's use
it to bail out earlier in error case.
I am still keeping the hard-coded values for other higher level hooks
such as page_read, page_write, etc. We know the value of tR, tPROG, but
we have unknowledge about the data transfer speed of the DMA engine.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
index 9e63cbd..514d189 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/denali.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void denali_reset_irq(struct denali_nand_info *denali)
}
static uint32_t denali_wait_for_irq(struct denali_nand_info *denali,
- uint32_t irq_mask)
+ u32 irq_mask, unsigned int timeout_ms)
{
unsigned long time_left, flags;
u32 irq_stat;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static uint32_t denali_wait_for_irq(struct denali_nand_info *denali,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&denali->irq_lock, flags);
time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&denali->complete,
- msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+ msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
if (!time_left) {
dev_err(denali->dev, "timeout while waiting for irq 0x%x\n",
irq_mask);
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int denali_sw_ecc_fixup(struct nand_chip *chip,
* Once handle all ECC errors, controller will trigger an
* ECC_TRANSACTION_DONE interrupt.
*/
- irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__ECC_TRANSACTION_DONE);
+ irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__ECC_TRANSACTION_DONE, 10);
if (!(irq_stat & INTR__ECC_TRANSACTION_DONE))
return -EIO;
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static int denali_pio_read(struct denali_nand_info *denali, u32 *buf,
for (i = 0; i < size / 4; i++)
buf[i] = denali->host_read(denali, addr);
- irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__PAGE_XFER_INC);
+ irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__PAGE_XFER_INC, 10);
if (!(irq_stat & INTR__PAGE_XFER_INC))
return -EIO;
@@ -444,7 +444,8 @@ static int denali_pio_write(struct denali_nand_info *denali, const u32 *buf,
denali->host_write(denali, addr, buf[i]);
irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali,
- INTR__PROGRAM_COMP | INTR__PROGRAM_FAIL);
+ INTR__PROGRAM_COMP | INTR__PROGRAM_FAIL,
+ 1000);
if (!(irq_stat & INTR__PROGRAM_COMP))
return -EIO;
@@ -501,7 +502,7 @@ static int denali_dma_xfer(struct denali_nand_info *denali, void *buf,
denali_reset_irq(denali);
denali->setup_dma(denali, dma_addr, page, write);
- irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, irq_mask);
+ irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, irq_mask, 1000);
if (!(irq_stat & INTR__DMA_CMD_COMP))
ret = -EIO;
else if (irq_stat & ecc_err_mask)
@@ -1168,12 +1169,13 @@ static void denali_exec_out16(struct denali_nand_info *denali, u32 type,
buf[i + 1] << 16 | buf[i]);
}
-static int denali_exec_waitrdy(struct denali_nand_info *denali)
+static int denali_exec_waitrdy(struct denali_nand_info *denali,
+ unsigned int timeout_ms)
{
u32 irq_stat;
/* R/B# pin transitioned from low to high? */
- irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__INT_ACT);
+ irq_stat = denali_wait_for_irq(denali, INTR__INT_ACT, timeout_ms);
/* Just in case nand_operation has multiple NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR. */
denali_reset_irq(denali);
@@ -1212,7 +1214,8 @@ static int denali_exec_instr(struct nand_chip *chip,
instr->ctx.data.len);
return 0;
case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
- return denali_exec_waitrdy(denali);
+ return denali_exec_waitrdy(denali,
+ instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms);
default:
WARN_ONCE(1, "unsupported NAND instruction type: %d\n",
instr->type);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists