linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:53:33 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm tree

On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9f58892ea996 ("drm/i915: Pull all the reset functionality together into i915_reset.c")
> 
> from the drm tree and commit:
> 
>   d0e93599d396 ("drm/i915: prepare for drmP.h removal from drm_modeset_helper.h")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think I got the right include files in the right order in
> the end - see below and please check the final result) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

There isn't a "below" afaics ....
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch