linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 00/16] Remove nested TPM operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <da69e24d-ad5c-1e7b-9f02-a435872ad635@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:10:32 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/16] Remove nested TPM operations

On 2/8/19 8:02 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 07:05:26AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> See my comment on [PATCH v11 08/16]. It needs to be added in that patch
>> since otherwise rc holds a non-zero value on function exit, which is wrong
>> at that point.
> The snippet in question:
>
> rc = chip->ops->send(chip, buf, count);
> if (rc < 0) {
> 	if (rc != -EPIPE)
> 		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> 			"%s: tpm_send: error %d\n", __func__, rc);
> 	return rc;
> }
>
> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)
> 	goto out_recv;
>
> 'send()' ought to return zero on success case.
>
> This is how the snippet was before applying any patches scheduled for
> v5.1:
>
> rc = chip->ops->send(chip, buf, count);
> if (rc < 0) {
> 	if (rc != -EPIPE)
> 		dev_err(&chip->dev,
> 			"%s: tpm_send: error %d\n", __func__, rc);
> 	return rc;
> }
>
> if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ)
> 	goto out_recv;
>
> Does not compute.

tpm_tis_send_main returns 'len' and that's what we have here.



>
> /Jarkko
>