[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190208160044.GB26005@archlinux-ryzen>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:00:44 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@...ux.ibm.com>,
Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@...ux.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@...ibm.com>,
Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@...rosemi.com>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, esc.storagedev@...rosemi.com,
Bradley Grove <bgrove@...otech.com>,
Don Brace <don.brace@...rosemi.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] scsi/ata: Use unsigned int for cmd's type in ioctls
in scsi_host_template
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:05:01AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:07:20AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Clang warns several times in the scsi subsystem (trimmed for brevity):
> >
> > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c:6209:7: warning: overflow converting case value to
> > switch condition type (2147762695 to 18446744071562347015) [-Wswitch]
> > case CCISS_GETBUSTYPES:
> > ^
> > drivers/scsi/hpsa.c:6208:7: warning: overflow converting case value to
> > switch condition type (2147762694 to 18446744071562347014) [-Wswitch]
> > case CCISS_GETHEARTBEAT:
> > ^
> >
> > The root cause is that the _IOC macro can generate really large numbers,
> > which don't fit into type 'int', which is used for the cmd parameter in
> > the ioctls in scsi_host_template. My research into how GCC and Clang are
> > handling this at a low level didn't prove fruitful. However, looking at
> > the rest of the kernel tree, all ioctls use an 'unsigned int' for the
> > cmd parameter, which will fit all of the _IOC values in the scsi/ata
> > subsystems.
> >
> > Make that change because none of the ioctls expect a negative value for
> > any command, it brings the ioctls inline with the reset of the kernel,
> > and it removes ambiguity, which is never good when dealing with compilers.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/85
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/154
> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/157
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> > Acked-by: Bradley Grove <bgrove@...otech.com>
> > Acked-by: Don Brace <don.brace@...rosemi.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> > Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> Looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Thank you for the review, it is much appreciated!
Nathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists