| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:16:56 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc: jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
david.safford@...com, monty.wiseman@...com,
matthewgarrett@...gle.com, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10, RESEND 4/6] tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
include/linux/tpm.h
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 09:41:14AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 2/8/2019 5:24 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > index afd022fc9d3d..816e686a73ac 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> > > #ifndef __LINUX_TPM_H__
> > > #define __LINUX_TPM_H__
> > > +#include <linux/hw_random.h>
> > > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> Hi Nathan
>
> I think the error comes from the line above.
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h includes <linux/tpm.h>, which now includes
> <linux/acpi.h>, which includes <asm/acpi.h>, which includes
> <linux/efi.h> (for the arm64 architecture only). Both ima.h and efi.h
> define 'NONE'.
>
Thank you for providing that analysis, I appreciate it!
> The solution would be to rename one of them. I'm not familiar with the
> EFI part. Renaming 'NONE' in IMA should be easy as it is not used
> anywhere.
>
This seems reasonable, no?
Thanks,
Nathan
========================================================================
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index d213e835c498..f203a86f1f23 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline unsigned long ima_hash_key(u8 *digest)
}
#define __ima_hooks(hook) \
- hook(NONE) \
+ hook(NO_CHECK) \
hook(FILE_CHECK) \
hook(MMAP_CHECK) \
hook(BPRM_CHECK) \
> Thanks
>
> Roberto
>
>
> > > +#include <linux/cdev.h>
> > > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > > #include <crypto/hash_info.h>
> > > #define TPM_DIGEST_SIZE 20 /* Max TPM v1.2 PCR size */
> > > @@ -75,6 +79,93 @@ struct tpm_class_ops {
> > > void (*clk_enable)(struct tpm_chip *chip, bool value);
> > > };
> > > +#define TPM_NUM_EVENT_LOG_FILES 3
> > > +
> > > +/* Indexes the duration array */
> > > +enum tpm_duration {
> > > + TPM_SHORT = 0,
> > > + TPM_MEDIUM = 1,
> > > + TPM_LONG = 2,
> > > + TPM_LONG_LONG = 3,
> > > + TPM_UNDEFINED,
> > > + TPM_NUM_DURATIONS = TPM_UNDEFINED,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +#define TPM_PPI_VERSION_LEN 3
> > > +
> > > +struct tpm_space {
> > > + u32 context_tbl[3];
> > > + u8 *context_buf;
> > > + u32 session_tbl[3];
> > > + u8 *session_buf;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct tpm_bios_log {
> > > + void *bios_event_log;
> > > + void *bios_event_log_end;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct tpm_chip_seqops {
> > > + struct tpm_chip *chip;
> > > + const struct seq_operations *seqops;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +struct tpm_chip {
> > > + struct device dev;
> > > + struct device devs;
> > > + struct cdev cdev;
> > > + struct cdev cdevs;
> > > +
> > > + /* A driver callback under ops cannot be run unless ops_sem is held
> > > + * (sometimes implicitly, eg for the sysfs code). ops becomes null
> > > + * when the driver is unregistered, see tpm_try_get_ops.
> > > + */
> > > + struct rw_semaphore ops_sem;
> > > + const struct tpm_class_ops *ops;
> > > +
> > > + struct tpm_bios_log log;
> > > + struct tpm_chip_seqops bin_log_seqops;
> > > + struct tpm_chip_seqops ascii_log_seqops;
> > > +
> > > + unsigned int flags;
> > > +
> > > + int dev_num; /* /dev/tpm# */
> > > + unsigned long is_open; /* only one allowed */
> > > +
> > > + char hwrng_name[64];
> > > + struct hwrng hwrng;
> > > +
> > > + struct mutex tpm_mutex; /* tpm is processing */
> > > +
> > > + unsigned long timeout_a; /* jiffies */
> > > + unsigned long timeout_b; /* jiffies */
> > > + unsigned long timeout_c; /* jiffies */
> > > + unsigned long timeout_d; /* jiffies */
> > > + bool timeout_adjusted;
> > > + unsigned long duration[TPM_NUM_DURATIONS]; /* jiffies */
> > > + bool duration_adjusted;
> > > +
> > > + struct dentry *bios_dir[TPM_NUM_EVENT_LOG_FILES];
> > > +
> > > + const struct attribute_group *groups[3];
> > > + unsigned int groups_cnt;
> > > +
> > > + u32 nr_allocated_banks;
> > > + struct tpm_bank_info *allocated_banks;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > > + acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle;
> > > + char ppi_version[TPM_PPI_VERSION_LEN + 1];
> > > +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
> > > +
> > > + struct tpm_space work_space;
> > > + u32 last_cc;
> > > + u32 nr_commands;
> > > + u32 *cc_attrs_tbl;
> > > +
> > > + /* active locality */
> > > + int locality;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > #if defined(CONFIG_TCG_TPM) || defined(CONFIG_TCG_TPM_MODULE)
> > > extern int tpm_is_tpm2(struct tpm_chip *chip);
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > This patch causes a build error with Clang (bisected on next-20190207):
> >
> > security/integrity/ima/ima.h:191:2: error: redefinition of enumerator 'NONE'
> > __ima_hooks(__ima_hook_enumify)
> > ^
> > security/integrity/ima/ima.h:176:7: note: expanded from macro '__ima_hooks'
> > hook(NONE) \
> > ^
> > include/linux/efi.h:1709:2: note: previous definition is here
> > NONE,
> > ^
> > 1 error generated.
> >
> > I am not sure how to reconcile this otherwise I would have sent a patch.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nathan
> >
>
> --
> HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
> Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists