lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  8 Feb 2019 17:35:10 +0000 (GMT)
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "dt-bindings: regulator: update fixed-regulator example" to the regulator tree

The patch

   dt-bindings: regulator: update fixed-regulator example

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From b735f41dcb06ae06acab2618b8814fe2dd1fca90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 15:04:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: update fixed-regulator example

Fixed regulators do not have associated bus addresses and are typically
placed directly under the root node where their names must still be
unique despite not having a unit address.

Fix the malformed example node which had a unit address but no "reg"
property by dropping the unit address.

Also, try to make the example more useful by using the recommended
generic node name "regulator", but with a suffix reflecting the
regulator name in order to make it unique.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml        | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml
index a7607b0baab7..d289c2f7455a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/fixed-regulator.yaml
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ required:
 
 examples:
   - |
-    abc: fixedregulator@0 {
+    reg_1v8: regulator-1v8 {
       compatible = "regulator-fixed";
-      regulator-name = "fixed-supply";
+      regulator-name = "1v8";
       regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
       regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
       gpio = <&gpio1 16 0>;
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ