| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190208174131.GB22401@e107155-lin>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:41:31 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq/opp: rework regulator initialization
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:04:18PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On 2019-02-08 12:51, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:47:06PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >> On 2019-02-08 12:00, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 01:22:25PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> >>>> Dear All,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a scenario that triggers the above issue:
> >>> [...]
> >>>> 1. system disables non-boot cpu's at the end of system suspend procedure,
> >>>> 2. this in turn deinitializes cpufreq drivers for the disabled cpus,
> >>>> 3. early in the system resume procedure all cpus are got back to online
> >>>> state,
> >>>> 4. this in turn causes cpufreq to be initialized for the newly onlined
> >>>> cpus,
> >>>> 5. cpufreq-dt acquires all its resources (clocks, regulators) during
> >>>> ->init() callback,
> >>> This is strictly not just restricted to cpufreq-dt, but to any driver
> >>> supporting multiple policies. So we need a generic fix not just
> >>> cpufreq-dt specific.
> >> Could you point which other driver needs similar fix? Here in cpufreq-dt
> >> the problem was caused by using regulator api (indirectly) from
> >> ->init(). All other drivers, which have regulators support, are for old,
> >> obsolete, uni-processor systems, which don't have the problem of
> >> secondary cpu suspend during system suspend/resume cycle.
> >>
> > scmi_cpufreq for instance. We can fix that in driver my moving to polling
> > to get cpufreq_get_rate, but we support both polling and interrupt based.
> > We may wait for remote processor interrupt in get_rate.
>
> Frankly, I don't feel I know enough to touch this driver and I don't
> think that this can even be fixed in a generic way in the cpufreq core.
Based on Rafael's suggestion, I cooked up something. See if this helps ?
The policy to cpu dance can be removed and we can just run through the
online cpumask I think.
Regards,
Sudeep
-->8
diff --git i/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c w/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e35a886e00bc..03d65a02a542 100644
--- i/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ w/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1640,6 +1640,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_generic_suspend);
void cpufreq_suspend(void)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ int cpu;
if (!cpufreq_driver)
return;
@@ -1662,6 +1663,11 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void)
}
suspend:
+ if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME)
+ for_each_active_policy(policy)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
+
cpufreq_suspended = true;
}
@@ -1674,7 +1680,7 @@ void cpufreq_suspend(void)
void cpufreq_resume(void)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
- int ret;
+ int ret, cpu;
if (!cpufreq_driver)
return;
@@ -1682,6 +1688,11 @@ void cpufreq_resume(void)
if (unlikely(!cpufreq_suspended))
return;
+ if (cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME)
+ for_each_active_policy(policy)
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)
+ cpufreq_online(cpu);
+
cpufreq_suspended = false;
if (!has_target() && !cpufreq_driver->resume)
@@ -2444,14 +2455,16 @@ static enum cpuhp_state hp_online;
static int cpuhp_cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
{
- cpufreq_online(cpu);
+ if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME))
+ cpufreq_online(cpu);
return 0;
}
static int cpuhp_cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
- cpufreq_offline(cpu);
+ if (!(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME))
+ cpufreq_offline(cpu);
return 0;
}
diff --git i/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c w/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 01871418ffde..0bfc96102739 100644
--- i/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ w/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ static void scmi_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static struct cpufreq_driver scmi_cpufreq_driver = {
.name = "scmi",
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
- CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK,
+ CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK |
+ CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.attr = cpufreq_generic_attr,
.target_index = scmi_cpufreq_set_target,
diff --git i/include/linux/cpufreq.h w/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index c86d6d8bdfed..9cf6b3ce063a 100644
--- i/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ w/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -385,6 +385,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
*/
#define CPUFREQ_NO_AUTO_DYNAMIC_SWITCHING (1 << 6)
+/*
+ * Set by drivers to advance/defer the cpufreq online/offline operation during
+ * system suspend/resume.
+ */
+#define CPUFREQ_DEFER_INIT_DURING_RESUME (1 << 7)
+
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists