lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:47:16 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        platform-driver-x86 <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: gpio: AMD G-Series pch gpio platform driver

On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 15:25 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * GPIO driver for the AMD G series FCH (eg. GX-412TC)
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2018 metux IT consult
> > + * Author: Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>
> > + *
> > + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL+
> > + */
> 
> I think checkpatch will complain on that SPDX thing.
> Copy something from one of the other drivers, it should be
> on the first line of the file.

Actually, checkpatch will complain that there isn't
an SPDX license on line 1 but will not complain about
the existence of an SPDX license on other line numbers.

Perhaps checkpatch _should_ complain when it sees an
SPDX license identifier outside the expected line.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists