[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75ea8364-9381-5d2c-6f8c-cb149780c416@infineon.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 19:02:51 +0100
From: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/16] Remove nested TPM operations
On 08.02.2019 15:09, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 02:28:50PM +0100, Alexander Steffen wrote:
>> Applying those changes fixes all the issues I saw, thanks. I'll retest
>> Jarkko's tree without custom patches, once you've agreed on the rc question.
>
> Just send a two patch patch set how I believe the regression should
> be properly fixed.
>
> Do not have right now dTPM at hand (the NUC that has one does not
> respond SSH for some reason) so I need help with testing.
Those patches seem to be changing fast :) I'll test them next week.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists