[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4072b2b6-0f95-be50-0772-7e2869c2c24e@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:12:34 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour
On 2/8/19 1:08 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The send() callback should never return length as it does not in every
> driver except tpm_crb in the success case. The reason is that the main
> transmit functionality only cares about whether the transmit was
> successful or not and ignores the count completely.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Let me know when you put it into your tree, I'll give it a spin while I
am at it. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists