lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4072b2b6-0f95-be50-0772-7e2869c2c24e@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Feb 2019 13:12:34 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Huewe <PeterHuewe@....de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@...ineon.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] tpm: Unify the send callback behaviour

On 2/8/19 1:08 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> The send() callback should never return length as it does not in every
> driver except tpm_crb in the success case. The reason is that the main
> transmit functionality only cares about whether the transmit was
> successful or not and ignores the count completely.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>

Let me know when you put it into your tree, I'll give it a spin while I 
am at it. :-)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ