[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190209182418.GR2353@nanopsycho>
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 19:24:18 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
jiri@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 10/16] rocker: Handle SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET
Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 07:21:47PM CET, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
[...]
>>+static int
>>+rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event(unsigned long event, struct net_device *netdev,
>>+ struct switchdev_notifier_port_attr_info
>>+ *port_attr_info)
>>+{
>>+ int err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>+
>>+ switch (event) {
>>+ case SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET:
>
>Do you expect some other event to be handled in
>rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event()? Because you have SWITCHDEV_PORT_ATTR_SET
>selected in case here and in rocker_switchdev_blocking_event.
>Perhaps you can rename rocker_switchdev_port_attr_event() to
>rocker_switchdev_port_attr_set_event() and avoid this switchcase.
Same comment applies on next 4 patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists