[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190210163929.GA5780@amd>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:39:30 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>
Cc: jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds: pwm: fix max_brightness works abnormal when
active_low
On Sun 2019-02-10 20:37:09, Yisheng Xie wrote:
> When leds-pwm is active_low, smaller number of duty kept in led_dat
> means less brighness, so we should disable pwm when led_dat->duty is
> equal to period instead of zero, which means max_brightness.
Will all pwm drivers leave the signal 'low' when pwm is disabled? Not
tristate or something?
Plus please use temporary variable. This is really hard to read.
Or maybe
led_dat->active_low * new_duty == led_dat->period
?
Pavel
> Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <ysxie@...mail.com>
> ---
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> index df80c89..07fb772 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void __led_pwm_set(struct led_pwm_data *led_dat)
>
> pwm_config(led_dat->pwm, new_duty, led_dat->period);
>
> - if (new_duty == 0)
> + if (led_dat->active_low ? new_duty == led_dat->period : new_duty == 0)
> pwm_disable(led_dat->pwm);
> else
> pwm_enable(led_dat->pwm);
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists