[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190211141821.413963373@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:19:42 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@....com.cn>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 101/137] proc/sysctl: fix return error for proc_doulongvec_minmax()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 09be178400829dddc1189b50a7888495dd26aa84 ]
If the number of input parameters is less than the total parameters, an
EINVAL error will be returned.
For example, we use proc_doulongvec_minmax to pass up to two parameters
with kern_table:
{
.procname = "monitor_signals",
.data = &monitor_sigs,
.maxlen = 2*sizeof(unsigned long),
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
},
Reproduce:
When passing two parameters, it's work normal. But passing only one
parameter, an error "Invalid argument"(EINVAL) is returned.
[root@...50 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
[root@...50 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
1 2
[root@...50 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@...50 ~]# echo $?
1
[root@...50 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
3 2
[root@...50 ~]#
The following is the result after apply this patch. No error is
returned when the number of input parameters is less than the total
parameters.
[root@...50 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
[root@...50 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
1 2
[root@...50 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
[root@...50 ~]# echo $?
0
[root@...50 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals
3 2
[root@...50 ~]#
There are three processing functions dealing with digital parameters,
__do_proc_dointvec/__do_proc_douintvec/__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax.
This patch deals with __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax, just as
__do_proc_dointvec does, adding a check for parameters 'left'. In
__do_proc_douintvec, its code implementation explicitly does not support
multiple inputs.
static int __do_proc_douintvec(...){
...
/*
* Arrays are not supported, keep this simple. *Do not* add
* support for them.
*/
if (vleft != 1) {
*lenp = 0;
return -EINVAL;
}
...
}
So, just __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax has the problem. And most use of
proc_doulongvec_minmax/proc_doulongvec_ms_jiffies_minmax just have one
parameter.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544081775-15720-1-git-send-email-cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@....com.cn>
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 23f658d311c0..93c7b02279b9 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2503,6 +2503,8 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int
bool neg;
left -= proc_skip_spaces(&p);
+ if (!left)
+ break;
err = proc_get_long(&p, &left, &val, &neg,
proc_wspace_sep,
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists