[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211081910.2effaf8f@lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 08:19:10 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2"
bogosity
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:58:11 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > > + * Both "GPL v2" and "GPL" (the latter also in dual licensed strings) are
> > > + * merily stating that the module is licensed under the GPL v2, but are not
> >
> > Nit: did you mean merely (as mere/just) ? or merily/merrily (as in
> > cheerfully/happily) ? :D
>
> Bah. merely of course.
>
> Jon, want me to resend?
Nah...I merily made the tweak while adding Jessica's ack.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists