lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:39:29 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>, Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] usb: typec: Find the ports by also matching
 against the device node

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 03:35:37PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:03 PM Heikki Krogerus
> > <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > When the connections are defined in firmware, struct
> > > device_connection will have the fwnode member pointing to
> > > the device node (struct fwnode_handle) of the requested
> > > device, and the endpoint will not be used at all in that
> > > case.
> > 
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * FIXME: Check does the fwnode supports the requested SVID. If it does
> > > +        * we need to return ERR_PTR(-PROBE_DEFER) when there is no device.
> > > +        */
> > > +       if (con->fwnode)
> > > +               return class_find_device(typec_class, NULL, con->fwnode,
> > > +                                        typec_port_fwnode_match);
> > > +
> > > +       dev = class_find_device(typec_class, NULL, con->endpoint[ep],
> > > +                               typec_port_name_match);
> > > +
> > > +       return dev ? dev : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > 
> > Just  to be clear, this one takes a reference on dev. Is it taken into account?
> 
> Yes. That is what we want it to do.

Gentle ping. Is the series OK?

thanks,

-- 
heikki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists