linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 284/313] fuse: call pipe_buf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190211141912.176375425@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:19:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 284/313] fuse: call pipe_buf_release() under pipe lock

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>

commit 9509941e9c534920ccc4771ae70bd6cbbe79df1c upstream.

Some of the pipe_buf_release() handlers seem to assume that the pipe is
locked - in particular, anon_pipe_buf_release() accesses pipe->tmp_page
without taking any extra locks. From a glance through the callers of
pipe_buf_release(), it looks like FUSE is the only one that calls
pipe_buf_release() without having the pipe locked.

This bug should only lead to a memory leak, nothing terrible.

Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/fuse/dev.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -2032,8 +2032,10 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(str
 
 	ret = fuse_dev_do_write(fud, &cs, len);
 
+	pipe_lock(pipe);
 	for (idx = 0; idx < nbuf; idx++)
 		pipe_buf_release(pipe, &bufs[idx]);
+	pipe_unlock(pipe);
 
 out:
 	kvfree(bufs);