linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 265/313] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190211141911.017231195@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:19:05 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@....aero>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 265/313] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

[ Upstream commit 75c05a74e745ae7d663b04d75777af80ada2233c ]

The ATU port vector contains a bit per port of the switch. The code
wrongly used it as a port number, and incremented a port counter. This
resulted in the wrong interfaces counter being incremented, and
potentially going off the end of the array of ports.

Fix this by using the source port ID for the violation, which really
is a port number.

Reported-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@....aero>
Tested-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@....aero>
Fixes: 65f60e4582bd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Keep ATU/VTU violation statistics")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c |   21 ++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
@@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob
 {
 	struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id;
 	struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry entry;
+	int spid;
 	int err;
 	u16 val;
 
@@ -336,6 +337,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob
 	if (err)
 		goto out;
 
+	spid = entry.state;
+
 	if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_AGE_OUT_VIOLATION) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
 				    "ATU age out violation for %pM\n",
@@ -344,23 +347,23 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob
 
 	if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MEMBER_VIOLATION) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
-				    "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
-				    entry.mac, entry.portvec);
-		chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_member_violation++;
+				    "ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
+				    entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
+		chip->ports[spid].atu_member_violation++;
 	}
 
 	if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MISS_VIOLATION) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
-				    "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
-				    entry.mac, entry.portvec);
-		chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_miss_violation++;
+				    "ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
+				    entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
+		chip->ports[spid].atu_miss_violation++;
 	}
 
 	if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_FULL_VIOLATION) {
 		dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
-				    "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
-				    entry.mac, entry.portvec);
-		chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_full_violation++;
+				    "ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
+				    entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
+		chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);