[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211084543.GA62722@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:45:43 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Indirect output through a
wrapper function
* Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> In preparation for a change to make this test run repeatedly which
> would generate huge amounts of output as is indirect all the printf()
> calls in the program through a wrapper and add a quiet flag which can
> be used to suppress the output. This is fairly quick and dirty, I'm not
> 100% sure what would be idiomatic here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
So this really loses useful output when there is a failure. After this
patch I get:
dagon:~/tip/tools/testing/selftests/x86> ./fsgsbase_64 -vv
[FAIL] 24 errors detected in 1 tries
Not very helpful, and no real command-line way to see the failures.
While previously it would tell me what's going on:
dagon:~/tip/tools/testing/selftests/x86> ./fsgsbase_64 | grep FAIL
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x1 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x1 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x1 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x1 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x1 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x1 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x1 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x1 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x1 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x1 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x1 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x1 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x200000000 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x200000000 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x200000000 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x200000000 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x200000000 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x200000000 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x200000000 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x200000000 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x200000000 to 0x3/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x1/0x200000000 to 0x1/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x2/0x200000000 to 0x2/0x0
[FAIL] GS/BASE changed from 0x3/0x200000000 to 0x3/0x0
So I believe at least failure messages need to be preserved.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists