[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190211141907.651753990@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:19:14 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Leonid Iziumtsev <leonid.iziumtsev@...il.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 327/352] dmaengine: imx-dma: fix wrong callback invoke
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Leonid Iziumtsev <leonid.iziumtsev@...il.com>
commit 341198eda723c8c1cddbb006a89ad9e362502ea2 upstream.
Once the "ld_queue" list is not empty, next descriptor will migrate
into "ld_active" list. The "desc" variable will be overwritten
during that transition. And later the dmaengine_desc_get_callback_invoke()
will use it as an argument. As result we invoke wrong callback.
That behaviour was in place since:
commit fcaaba6c7136 ("dmaengine: imx-dma: fix callback path in tasklet").
But after commit 4cd13c21b207 ("softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job")
things got worse, since possible delay between tasklet_schedule()
from DMA irq handler and actual tasklet function execution got bigger.
And that gave more time for new DMA request to be submitted and
to be put into "ld_queue" list.
It has been noticed that DMA issue is causing problems for "mxc-mmc"
driver. While stressing the system with heavy network traffic and
writing/reading to/from sd card simultaneously the timeout may happen:
10013000.sdhci: mxcmci_watchdog: read time out (status = 0x30004900)
That often lead to file system corruption.
Signed-off-by: Leonid Iziumtsev <leonid.iziumtsev@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/dma/imx-dma.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static void imxdma_tasklet(unsigned long
{
struct imxdma_channel *imxdmac = (void *)data;
struct imxdma_engine *imxdma = imxdmac->imxdma;
- struct imxdma_desc *desc;
+ struct imxdma_desc *desc, *next_desc;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&imxdma->lock, flags);
@@ -648,10 +648,10 @@ static void imxdma_tasklet(unsigned long
list_move_tail(imxdmac->ld_active.next, &imxdmac->ld_free);
if (!list_empty(&imxdmac->ld_queue)) {
- desc = list_first_entry(&imxdmac->ld_queue, struct imxdma_desc,
- node);
+ next_desc = list_first_entry(&imxdmac->ld_queue,
+ struct imxdma_desc, node);
list_move_tail(imxdmac->ld_queue.next, &imxdmac->ld_active);
- if (imxdma_xfer_desc(desc) < 0)
+ if (imxdma_xfer_desc(next_desc) < 0)
dev_warn(imxdma->dev, "%s: channel: %d couldn't xfer desc\n",
__func__, imxdmac->channel);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists