linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 011/352] genirq/affinity: Spread IRQs to all available NUMA nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190211141847.139076298@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:13:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 011/352] genirq/affinity: Spread IRQs to all available NUMA nodes

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit b82592199032bf7c778f861b936287e37ebc9f62 ]

If the number of NUMA nodes exceeds the number of MSI/MSI-X interrupts
which are allocated for a device, the interrupt affinity spreading code
fails to spread them across all nodes.

The reason is, that the spreading code starts from node 0 and continues up
to the number of interrupts requested for allocation. This leaves the nodes
past the last interrupt unused.

This results in interrupt concentration on the first nodes which violates
the assumption of the block layer that all nodes are covered evenly. As a
consequence the NUMA nodes above the number of interrupts are all assigned
to hardware queue 0 and therefore NUMA node 0, which results in bad
performance and has CPU hotplug implications, because queue 0 gets shut
down when the last CPU of node 0 is offlined.

Go over all NUMA nodes and assign them round-robin to all requested
interrupts to solve this.

[ tglx: Massaged changelog ]

Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181102180248.13583-1-longli@linuxonhyperv.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
index f4f29b9d90ee..e12cdf637c71 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -117,12 +117,11 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
 	 */
 	if (numvecs <= nodes) {
 		for_each_node_mask(n, nodemsk) {
-			cpumask_copy(masks + curvec, node_to_cpumask[n]);
-			if (++done == numvecs)
-				break;
+			cpumask_or(masks + curvec, masks + curvec, node_to_cpumask[n]);
 			if (++curvec == last_affv)
 				curvec = affd->pre_vectors;
 		}
+		done = numvecs;
 		goto out;
 	}

-- 
2.19.1