linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Add multi-master use case support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d26a95ac-41ab-91eb-bbae-e4143235e531@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 10:09:53 -0800
From:   Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        James Feist <james.feist@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: aspeed: Add multi-master use case support

> Hmmm, the #ifdeffery quite increases with this patch. Maybe it is easier
> to select I2C_SLAVE in Kconfig? I'll let you decide.
> 
> My code checkers found this:
> 
>      CPPCHECK
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c:694:10: warning: Variable 'ret' is assigned a value that is never used. [unreadVariable]
> 

Hi Wolfram,

Yes, cppcheck pointed it out correctly. The assignment on the variable
'ret' is not needed at there. Actually, the code should not be wrapped
using I2C_SLAVE because a bus can also be in multi-master environment
even when slave is not enabled. So the warning can be removed by below
fix.

---
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c 
b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
index 9253ebccb008..882c4ab1d18a 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
@@ -655,7 +655,6 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter 
*adap,
  {
         struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
         unsigned long time_left, flags;
-       int ret;

         spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->lock, flags);
         bus->cmd_err = 0;
@@ -664,6 +663,8 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter 
*adap,
         if (!bus->multi_master &&
             (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
              ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS)) {
+               int ret;
+
                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bus->lock, flags);
                 ret = aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
                 if (ret)
@@ -691,7 +692,7 @@ static int aspeed_i2c_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter 
*adap,
                 if (bus->multi_master &&
                     (readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_CMD_REG) &
                      ASPEED_I2CD_BUS_BUSY_STS))
-                       ret = aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);
+                       aspeed_i2c_recover_bus(bus);

                 return -ETIMEDOUT;
---

The reason of adding changes at line 658 and 667 is to remove below
cppcheck warning when the change at 694 is applied.

[drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c:670]: (style) The scope of the variable 
'ret' can be reduced.

Can you please apply above changes on top of this patch? Or I can submit
v2 with it.

Thanks,
Jae