[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211183749.GO19618@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:37:50 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux_dti@...oud.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
will.deacon@....com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
kristen@...ux.intel.com, deneen.t.dock@...el.com,
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/20] x86/jump-label: remove support for custom poker
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 04:34:13PM -0800, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>
> There are only two types of poking: early and breakpoint based. The use
> of a function pointer to perform poking complicates the code and is
> probably inefficient due to the use of indirect branches.
>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/jump_label.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
...
> @@ -80,16 +71,17 @@ static void __ref __jump_label_transform(struct jump_entry *entry,
> bug_at((void *)jump_entry_code(entry), line);
>
> /*
> - * Make text_poke_bp() a default fallback poker.
> + * As long as we're UP and not yet marked RO, we can use
> + * text_poke_early; SYSTEM_BOOTING guarantees both, as we switch to
> + * SYSTEM_SCHEDULING before going either.
s/going/doing/ ?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists