lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 20:34:25 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        discussion and development DRM maintainer tools
         announcements <dim-tools@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL] topic/component-typed

On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:18:04PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 7:57 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:25:12 +0100,
> > Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 06:15:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Here's the typed component topic branch.
> > > >
> > > > drm-intel maintainers: Please pull, I need this for the mei hdcp work from Ram.
> > > >
> > > > drm-misc maintainers: Please pull, there's a drm doc patch follow-up
> > > > that I want to stuff into drm-misc-next.
> > > >
> > > > Greg: The drm side missed our feature cutoff, so will only land in 5.2.
> > >
> > > With all the dependencies why not bend the rule a little and get this in now?
> > > It is not like this is a huge patchset.
> >
> > Yeah, that's likely the most straightforward way.
> >
> > BTW, I tried to pull onto sound git tree for-next branch, and it
> > worked without conflicts.  So I don't think it needs to be pulled onto
> > mine.
> 
> Yeah right now it's all conflict free, I'm more worried about what's
> going to happen the next 3 months. That's also why I think it'd be
> good if Greg can pull this still.

Ok, I've pulled this into my branch, it should go into 5.1-rc1.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ