[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190211201619.GA8065@work>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:16:19 -0500
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>, pr-tracker-bot@...nel.org,
Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Thermal-SoC management fixes for v5.0-rc6
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:34:09AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
>> > > fixes
>> >
>> > has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
>> > https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/7ad915f5ebf5b9e7ca98a7048d8f84a631fe388b
>>
>> I think the bot is off here because the above commit is about a merge
>> from the linux-omap tree from Tony.
>
>Indeed.
>
>.. and the pr-tracker-bot thing actually made me ignore the pull
>request, thinking I had left it in my inbox despite having pulled it.
>
>So it would be really good to know why pr-tracker-bot ended up
>replying to the wrong email, because it can cause real problems.
Okay, so I need guidance on the proper behaviour here. As this request
didn't use the magic wording for the commit-id (as generated by
git-request-pull), we ended up trying to look up the remote. The remote
specified was:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal fixes
Since it's a short refname, we first try to look it up as a tag:
$ git ls-remote git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal fixes^{}
a6d25f4c951b8b28f2eaec6f891ff834622532f2 refs/tags/omap-for-v3.10-rc1/fixes^{}
77319669af37a1cfc844b801e83343b37e3c7e13 refs/tags/omap/fixes^{}
If it finds a matching tag, the script assumes you'd meant to specify
the tag, not the head. Is that the opposite of git's behaviour when
applying a remote? Should we be checking for a head first, before we try
the refname as a tag? I assume that's the case, but want to double-check
with you all.
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists