linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] soc: qcom: Add AOSS QMP communication driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=WDnKgiqP7Ta0xJtm5COTApYQ2DPTcUXH95O7S_vUJBCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:30:26 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@...eaurora.org>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/8] soc: qcom: Add AOSS QMP communication driver

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:13 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> +       if (of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "#power-domain-cells")) {
> +               qmp->pd_pdev = platform_device_register_data(&pdev->dev,
> +                                                            "aoss_qmp_pd",
> +                                                            PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +                                                            NULL, 0);
> +               if (IS_ERR(qmp->pd_pdev)) {
> +                       dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register AOSS PD\n");

nit: not worth spinning just for this, but if you happen to spin you
could print the error number in your message.

> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->pd_pdev);
> +                       goto err_close_qmp;
> +               }
> +       }

As discussed in v5 I wonder if the complexity of a separate driver is
really worth it or if everything would be a lot easier to just link
the two ".c" files together.  Now that it's a full error case if
"aoss_qmp_pd" doesn't probe I'd vote for linking the two ".c" files
together, but part of that is because I don't really want to dig into
all the details of how you're supposed to call
platform_device_register_data() for sub-devices and double-checking
that you've got all the corner cases correct.

...NOTE: presumably if you just change it to a straight-up function
call then you can also get rid of the above "dev_err" since
(presumably) you'll know that the init code of aoss_qmp_pd will print
any relevant errors?

-Doug