linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 09/12] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvqMR7T=3ORvXPihkz-WbTN+oFeHkCu9uvebEq9wTLpJuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:21:43 -0800
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Ran Rozenstein <ranro@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "y2038@...ts.linaro.org" <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
        "chris@...kel.net" <chris@...kel.net>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "rth@...ddle.net" <rth@...ddle.net>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "ubraun@...ux.ibm.com" <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
        "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 09/12] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW

On Feb 10, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Ran Rozenstein <ranro@...lanox.com> wrote:

>> Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 09/12] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW
>>
>> Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW variant of socket timestamp options.
>> This is the y2038 safe versions of the SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD for all
>> architectures.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have app that include:
>    #include <linux/errqueue.h>
>
> It now fail with this error:
>    In file included from timestamping.c:6:0:
>    /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:46:27: error: array type has incomplete element type 'struct __kernel_timespec'
>      struct __kernel_timespec ts[3];
>                                       ^~
> I tried to do the trivial fix, to include time.h:
> In include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
>    #include <linux/time.h>
>    #include <linux/types.h>
>
> But it just add some other noises:
>                In file included from /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:5:0,
>                                 from timestamping.c:6:
>                /usr/include/linux/time.h:10:8: error: redefinition of ?struct timespec?
>                 struct timespec {
>                        ^~~~~~~~
>                In file included from /usr/include/sys/select.h:39:0,
>                                 from /usr/include/sys/types.h:197,
>                                 from /usr/include/stdlib.h:279,
>                                 from timestamping.c:2:
>                /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timespec.h:8:8: note: originally defined here
>                 struct timespec
>                        ^~~~~~~~
>                In file included from /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h:5:0,
>                                 from timestamping.c:6:
>                /usr/include/linux/time.h:16:8: error: redefinition of ?struct timeval?
>                 struct timeval {
>                        ^~~~~~~
>                In file included from /usr/include/sys/select.h:37:0,
>                                 from /usr/include/sys/types.h:197,
>                                 from /usr/include/stdlib.h:279,
>                                 from timestamping.c:2:
>                /usr/include/bits/types/struct_timeval.h:8:8: note: originally defined here
>                 struct timeval
>                        ^~~~~~~
>
>
> Can you please advise how to solve it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ran

The errqueue.h already had the same issue reported previously:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAF=yD-L2ntuH54J_SwN9WcpBMgkV_v0e-Q2Pu2mrQ3+1RozGFQ@mail.gmail.com/

Earlier when I tested this with kernel selftests such as
tools/testing/selftests/networking/timestamping/rxtimestamp(the test
was broken to begin with because of  missing include of unistd.h), I
was using make.cross to build.
This does not put the headers in the right place
(obj-$ARCH/usr/include instead of usr/include). Hence, I did not
realize that this breaks the inclusion of errqueue.h due to the
missing __kernel_timespec definition.
I forgot that nobody seems to be using linux/time.h.

But, if I include guards( #ifndef __KERNEL__) for struct timespec,
struct timeval etc for linux/time.h, then we can include it from
userspace/ errqueue.h for __kernel_timespec:

--- a/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/errqueue.h
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_ERRQUEUE_H
 #define _UAPI_LINUX_ERRQUEUE_H

-#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/time.h>

 struct sock_extended_err {
        __u32   ee_errno;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/time.h b/include/uapi/linux/time.h
index a6aca9aaab80..40913d9a5bc8 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/time.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/time.h
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>


+#ifdef __KERNEL__
+
 #ifndef _STRUCT_TIMESPEC
 #define _STRUCT_TIMESPEC
 struct timespec {
@@ -42,6 +44,8 @@ struct itimerval {
        struct timeval it_value;        /* current value */
 };

+#endif /* __KERNEL__ */

Arnd,

I forgot how we plan to include the definition for __kernel_timespec
for libc or userspace. Does this seem right to you?
Also these changes to errqueue.h needs to be reverted probably as this
breaks userspace.

Thanks,
-Deepa







-Deepa