[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR07MB4709A40204EF528F8A04E1EDDD640@BYAPR07MB4709.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:56:25 +0000
From: Pawel Laszczak <pawell@...ence.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"rogerq@...com" <rogerq@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jbergsagel@...com" <jbergsagel@...com>,
"nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>, "nm@...com" <nm@...com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
"peter.chen@....com" <peter.chen@....com>,
Pawel Jez <pjez@...ence.com>, Rahul Kumar <kurahul@...ence.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/6] usb:common Separated decoding functions from dwc3
driver.
Hi,
>
>Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:52:29AM +0000, Pawel Laszczak wrote:
>>> Patch moves some decoding functions from driver/usb/dwc3/debug.h driver
>>> to driver/usb/common/debug.c file. These moved functions include:
>>> dwc3_decode_get_status
>>> dwc3_decode_set_clear_feature
>>> dwc3_decode_set_address
>>> dwc3_decode_get_set_descriptor
>>> dwc3_decode_get_configuration
>>> dwc3_decode_set_configuration
>>> dwc3_decode_get_intf
>>> dwc3_decode_set_intf
>>> dwc3_decode_synch_frame
>>> dwc3_decode_set_sel
>>> dwc3_decode_set_isoch_delay
>>> dwc3_decode_ctrl
>>>
>>> These functions are used also in inroduced cdns3 driver.
>>>
>>> All functions prefixes were changed from dwc3 to usb.
>>
>> Ick, why?
>
>moving dwc3-specific code into generic code.
>
>>> Also, function's parameters has been extended according to the name
>>> of fields in standard SETUP packet.
>>> Additionally, patch adds usb_decode_ctrl function to
>>> include/linux/usb/ch9.h file.
>>
>> Why ch9.h? It's not something that is specified in the spec, it's a
>> usb-specific thing :)
>
>agree.
Similar as usb_state_string function from include/linux/usb/ch9.h which
"Returns human readable name for the state", the usb_decode_ctrl function
make the same but for standard USB request.
USB Request is usb-specifing thing.
If my idea is not correct, can you suggest where this function declaration should be moved.
>
>>> +/**
>>> + * usb_decode_ctrl - Returns human readable representation of control request.
>>> + * @str: buffer to return a human-readable representation of control request.
>>> + * This buffer should have about 200 bytes.
>>
>> "about 200 bytes" is not very specific.
>>
>> Pass in the length so we know we don't overflow it.
>
>agree.
I also agree and I will add such parameter.
>
>>> + * @bRequestType: matches the USB bmRequestType field
>>> + * @bRequest: matches the USB bRequest field
>>> + * @wValue: matches the USB wValue field (CPU byte order)
>>> + * @wIndex: matches the USB wIndex field (CPU byte order)
>>> + * @wLength: matches the USB wLength field (CPU byte order)
>>> + *
>>> + * Function returns decoded, formatted and human-readable description of
>>> + * control request packet.
>>> + *
>>> + * Important: wValue, wIndex, wLength parameters before invoking this function
>>> + * should be processed by le16_to_cpu macro.
>>> + */
>>> +const char *usb_decode_ctrl(char *str, __u8 bRequestType, __u8 bRequest,
>>> + __u16 wValue, __u16 wIndex, __u16 wLength);
>>
>> Why are you returning a value, isn't the data stored in str? Why not
>> just return an int saying if the call succeeded or not?
>
>There is one detail here. The usage scenario for this is for
>tracepoints. When dealing with tracepoints we want to delay decoding of
>the data into strings until print-time. I guess it's best to illustrate
>with an example:
>
>DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dwc3_log_ctrl,
> TP_PROTO(struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl),
> TP_ARGS(ctrl),
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __field(__u8, bRequestType)
> __field(__u8, bRequest)
> __field(__u16, wValue)
> __field(__u16, wIndex)
> __field(__u16, wLength)
> __dynamic_array(char, str, DWC3_MSG_MAX)
> ),
> TP_fast_assign(
> __entry->bRequestType = ctrl->bRequestType;
> __entry->bRequest = ctrl->bRequest;
> __entry->wValue = le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wValue);
> __entry->wIndex = le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wIndex);
> __entry->wLength = le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wLength);
> ),
> TP_printk("%s", dwc3_decode_ctrl(__get_str(str), DWC3_MSG_MAX,
> __entry->bRequestType,
> __entry->bRequest, __entry->wValue,
> __entry->wIndex, __entry->wLength)
> )
>);
>
>The above is the code is today (well, I've added buffer size as an
>argument). If I make dwc3_decode_ctrl() return an integer, I can't call
>it from TP_printk() time. I'd have to move it to TP_fast_assign() time
>which is supposed to be, simply, a copy of the necessary data. IOW, I
>would have this:
>
>DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(dwc3_log_ctrl,
> TP_PROTO(struct usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl),
> TP_ARGS(ctrl),
> TP_STRUCT__entry(
> __dynamic_array(char, str, DWC3_MSG_MAX)
> ),
> TP_fast_assign(
> dwc3_decode_ctrl(__get_str(str), DWC3_MSG_MAX,
> ctrl->bRequestType,
> ctrl->bRequest,
> le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wValue),
> le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wIndex),
> le16_to_cpu(ctrl->wLength));
> ),
> TP_printk("%s", __get_str(str)
> )
>);
>
>Essentially, we end up moving decoding of the tracepoint to the time it
>is captured; IOW, we reintroduce regular latency of string formatting.
>
>What we could do, is move all functions called by dwc3_decode_ctrl() to
>return int, but leave dwc3_decode_ctrl() returning a pointer to str just
>so we continue decoding the data at printing time.
I will try to change these functions in this way.
>
>--
Thanks
Pawel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists