[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJU2bMRPYWNRgBRtY9q6JoMLB+M89PYvA17F+=SSZeovag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:08:33 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 03/33] ARM: davinci: select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
pon., 11 lut 2019 o 13:50 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On 11/02/2019 12:25, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > In order to support SPARSE_IRQ we first need to make davinci use the
> > generic irq handler for ARM. Translate the legacy assembly to C and
> > put the irq handlers into their respective drivers (aintc and cp-intc).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c | 28 +++++++++++++
> > .../mach-davinci/include/mach/entry-macro.S | 39 -------------------
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c | 23 +++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > index 664e918e2624..f7770fdcad68 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ config ARCH_DAVINCI
> > select GENERIC_ALLOCATOR
> > select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> > select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> > + select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> > select GPIOLIB
> > select HAVE_IDE
> > select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > index 67805ca74ff8..4a372add8cf9 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/cp_intc.c
> > @@ -19,9 +19,13 @@
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >
> > +#include <asm/exception.h>
> > #include <mach/common.h>
> > #include "cp_intc.h"
> >
> > +#define DAVINCI_CP_INTC_PRI_INDX_MASK GENMASK(9, 0)
> > +#define DAVINCI_CP_INTC_GPIR_NONE BIT(31)
> > +
> > static inline unsigned int cp_intc_read(unsigned offset)
> > {
> > return __raw_readl(davinci_intc_base + offset);
> > @@ -97,6 +101,28 @@ static struct irq_chip cp_intc_irq_chip = {
> >
> > static struct irq_domain *cp_intc_domain;
> >
> > +static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> > +cp_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + int gpir, irqnr, none;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The interrupt number is in first ten bits. The NONE field set to 1
> > + * indicates a spurious irq.
> > + */
> > +
> > + gpir = cp_intc_read(CP_INTC_PRIO_IDX);
> > + irqnr = gpir & DAVINCI_CP_INTC_PRI_INDX_MASK;
> > + none = gpir & DAVINCI_CP_INTC_GPIR_NONE;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(none)) {
> > + pr_err_once("%s: spurious irq!\n", __func__);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + handle_domain_irq(cp_intc_domain, irqnr, regs);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int cp_intc_host_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
> > irq_hw_number_t hw)
> > {
> > @@ -196,6 +222,8 @@ int __init cp_intc_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > + set_handle_irq(cp_intc_handle_irq);
> > +
> > /* Enable global interrupt */
> > cp_intc_write(1, CP_INTC_GLOBAL_ENABLE);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/entry-macro.S b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> > deleted file mode 100644
> > index cf5f573eb5fd..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/entry-macro.S
> > +++ /dev/null
> > @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
> > -/*
> > - * Low-level IRQ helper macros for TI DaVinci-based platforms
> > - *
> > - * Author: Kevin Hilman, MontaVista Software, Inc. <source@...sta.com>
> > - *
> > - * 2007 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
> > - * the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program
> > - * is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express
> > - * or implied.
> > - */
> > -#include <mach/irqs.h>
> > -
> > - .macro get_irqnr_preamble, base, tmp
> > - ldr \base, =davinci_intc_base
> > - ldr \base, [\base]
> > - .endm
> > -
> > - .macro get_irqnr_and_base, irqnr, irqstat, base, tmp
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_AINTC) && defined(CONFIG_CP_INTC)
> > - ldr \tmp, =davinci_intc_type
> > - ldr \tmp, [\tmp]
> > - cmp \tmp, #DAVINCI_INTC_TYPE_CP_INTC
> > - beq 1001f
> > -#endif
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_AINTC)
> > - ldr \tmp, [\base, #0x14]
> > - movs \tmp, \tmp, lsr #2
> > - sub \irqnr, \tmp, #1
> > - b 1002f
> > -#endif
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_CP_INTC)
> > -1001: ldr \irqnr, [\base, #0x80] /* get irq number */
> > - mov \tmp, \irqnr, lsr #31
> > - and \irqnr, \irqnr, #0xff /* irq is in bits 0-9 */
> > - and \tmp, \tmp, #0x1
> > - cmp \tmp, #0x1
> > -#endif
> > -1002:
> > - .endm
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > index 07d8ef8037e4..3ce821a06e52 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/irq.c
> > @@ -29,11 +29,13 @@
> > #include <mach/cputype.h>
> > #include <mach/common.h>
> > #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
> > +#include <asm/exception.h>
> >
> > #define FIQ_REG0_OFFSET 0x0000
> > #define FIQ_REG1_OFFSET 0x0004
> > #define IRQ_REG0_OFFSET 0x0008
> > #define IRQ_REG1_OFFSET 0x000C
> > +#define IRQ_IRQENTRY_OFFSET 0x0014
> > #define IRQ_ENT_REG0_OFFSET 0x0018
> > #define IRQ_ENT_REG1_OFFSET 0x001C
> > #define IRQ_INCTL_REG_OFFSET 0x0020
> > @@ -48,6 +50,11 @@ static inline void davinci_irq_writel(unsigned long value, int offset)
> > __raw_writel(value, davinci_intc_base + offset);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline unsigned long davinci_irq_readl(int offset)
> > +{
> > + return __raw_readl(davinci_intc_base + offset);
>
> I appreciate that you're converting assembly code dating from a while
> back, but if we're going to do this correctly, I don't think we should
> entertain the use of __raw_readl().
>
> Surely the bus has a fixed endianness (and I'd assume it to be LE). Why
> aren't you using readl_relaxed() instead, which will have the exact same
> generated code with an LE kernel, and will do the right thing should you
> run a BE kernel.
>
Oh snap! I actually converted other calls to the relaxed variants, but
missed this patch.
Thanks for spotting that.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists