[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190211130940.28206-1-hch@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:09:40 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: stuart.w.hayes@...il.com, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell_rbu: fix lock imbalance in img_update_realloc
We need to ensure rbu_data.lock is always held on return.
Fixes: 289790a3ea94 ("platform/x86: dell_rbu: stop abusing the DMA API")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
drivers/platform/x86/dell_rbu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell_rbu.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell_rbu.c
index 8104ca0c44ca..031c68903583 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell_rbu.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell_rbu.c
@@ -436,6 +436,7 @@ static int img_update_realloc(unsigned long size)
ordernum = get_order(size);
image_update_buffer =
(unsigned char *)__get_free_pages(GFP_DMA32, ordernum);
+ spin_lock(&rbu_data.lock);
if (!image_update_buffer) {
pr_debug("Not enough memory for image update:"
"size = %ld\n", size);
@@ -446,7 +447,6 @@ static int img_update_realloc(unsigned long size)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(img_buf_phys_addr > BIOS_SCAN_LIMIT))
return -EINVAL; /* can't happen per definition */
- spin_lock(&rbu_data.lock);
rbu_data.image_update_buffer = image_update_buffer;
rbu_data.image_update_buffer_size = size;
rbu_data.bios_image_size = rbu_data.image_update_buffer_size;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists