lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:13:38 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Viresh Kumar <>,
        Linux PM <>,
        Vincent Guittot <>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure

On 08-02-19, 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> At least some of the underlying mechanics seem to be very similar.
> You have priority lists, addition and removal of requests etc.
> Arguably, PM QoS may be regarded as a bit overly complicated, but
> maybe they both can use a common library underneath?
> As I said I like the idea of replacing cpufreq notifiers with
> something nicer, so if you can avoid doing almost-the-same-ting in two
> different frameworks, it would be fine by me.

Ok, will try to move to PM QoS. Thanks.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists