linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.20 266/352] ocfs2: dont clear bh uptodate for block read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190211141903.943022204@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:18:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>,
        Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>,
        Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>,
        Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>,
        Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.20 266/352] ocfs2: dont clear bh uptodate for block read

4.20-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 70306d9dce75abde855cefaf32b3f71eed8602a3 ]

For sync io read in ocfs2_read_blocks_sync(), first clear bh uptodate flag
and submit the io, second wait io done, last check whether bh uptodate, if
not return io error.

If two sync io for the same bh were issued, it could be the first io done
and set uptodate flag, but just before check that flag, the second io came
in and cleared uptodate, then ocfs2_read_blocks_sync() for the first io
will return IO error.

Indeed it's not necessary to clear uptodate flag, as the io end handler
end_buffer_read_sync() will set or clear it based on io succeed or failed.

The following message was found from a nfs server but the underlying
storage returned no error.

[4106438.567376] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit:2780 ERROR: read block 1238823695 failed -5
[4106438.567569] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_suballoc_slot_bit:2812 ERROR: status = -5
[4106438.567611] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_test_inode_bit:2894 ERROR: get alloc slot and bit failed -5
[4106438.567643] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_test_inode_bit:2932 ERROR: status = -5
[4106438.567675] (nfsd,7146,3):ocfs2_get_dentry:94 ERROR: test inode bit failed -5

Same issue in non sync read ocfs2_read_blocks(), fixed it as well.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181121020023.3034-4-junxiao.bi@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>
Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen@...wei.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@...wei.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
index 4ebbd57cbf84..f9b84f7a3e4b 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c
@@ -161,7 +161,6 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks_sync(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u64 block,
 #endif
 		}
 
-		clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 		get_bh(bh); /* for end_buffer_read_sync() */
 		bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
 		submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bh);
@@ -341,7 +340,6 @@ int ocfs2_read_blocks(struct ocfs2_caching_info *ci, u64 block, int nr,
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			clear_buffer_uptodate(bh);
 			get_bh(bh); /* for end_buffer_read_sync() */
 			if (validate)
 				set_buffer_needs_validate(bh);
-- 
2.19.1