linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Remove getting SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190212.095030.1445077555795164973.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 09:50:30 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jiri@...lanox.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Remove getting
 SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 13:17:46 -0800

> AFAICT there is no code that attempts to get the value of the attribute
> SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_BRIDGE_FLAGS while it is used with
> switchdev_port_attr_set().
> 
> This is effectively no doing anything and it can slow down future work
> that tries to make modifications in these areas so remove that.

Series applied.

> David, there should be no dependency with previous patch series, but
> again, feedback from Ido and Jiri would be welcome in case this was
> added for a reason.

Ok, is there going to be another respin of that switchdev_ops removal
series?