linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rtc tree with the clk tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190212211447.GB10129@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:14:47 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rtc tree with the clk tree

Hi Stephen and Stephen,

On 12/02/2019 13:02:38-0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2019-02-10 21:17:31)
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rtc tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/clk/at91/sama5d2.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   77977b800451 ("clk: at91: enable AUDIOPLL as source for PCKx on SAMA5D2")
> > 
> > from the clk tree and commit:
> > 
> >   34d2ff2a6019 ("clk: at91: fix masterck name")
> > 
> > from the rtc tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> 
> Thanks. Looks good to me.

Actually, that was my mistake and I removed it from the RTC tree. I'm
really intending for "clk: at91: fix masterck name" to go through the
clk tree. I simply forgot to remove the patch from this branch after
testing it...

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com