[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJ86XosW71111EaaSKcVwzw+UYvi4j619KwoBn=DNwrNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 16:26:02 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is specified
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:21 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> Kees Cook wrote:
> > To avoid potential confusion, explicitly ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is
> > used on the command line, and report that it is happening.
>
> To maintain the existing behavior of CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY, I also suggest this change.
> This saves e.g. Ubuntu users who are using only AppArmor from explicitly specifying
> security=apparmor when they don't want to enable other LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR modules.
No, this completely disables the purpose of lsm=
I don't understand the use-case you're concerned about?
-Kees
>
> ---
> security/Kconfig | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/security.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
> index 9555f49..6a40995 100644
> --- a/security/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/Kconfig
> @@ -250,5 +250,42 @@ config LSM
>
> If unsure, leave this as the default.
>
> +choice
> + prompt "Default exclusive security module"
> + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX if SECURITY_SELINUX
> + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK if SECURITY_SMACK
> + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO if SECURITY_TOMOYO
> + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR if SECURITY_APPARMOR
> + default DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> +
> + help
> + The security module where only one of these modules should be enabled if
> + neither the "security=" parameter nor the "lsm=" parameter is specified.
> +
> + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX
> + bool "SELinux" if SECURITY_SELINUX=y
> +
> + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> + bool "Simplified Mandatory Access Control" if SECURITY_SMACK=y
> +
> + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> + bool "TOMOYO" if SECURITY_TOMOYO=y
> +
> + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> + bool "AppArmor" if SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
> +
> + config DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> + bool "Unix Discretionary Access Controls"
> +
> +endchoice
> +
> +config DEFAULT_SECURITY
> + string
> + default "selinux" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX
> + default "smack" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_SMACK
> + default "tomoyo" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_TOMOYO
> + default "apparmor" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_APPARMOR
> + default "" if DEFAULT_SECURITY_DAC
> +
> endmenu
>
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index e6153ed..c44e3cd 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -294,8 +294,11 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
> chosen_major_lsm = NULL;
> }
> ordered_lsm_parse(chosen_lsm_order, "cmdline");
> - } else
> + } else {
> + if (!chosen_major_lsm)
> + chosen_major_lsm = CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY;
> ordered_lsm_parse(builtin_lsm_order, "builtin");
> + }
>
> for (lsm = ordered_lsms; *lsm; lsm++)
> prepare_lsm(*lsm);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists