[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6518a7ff-0586-be7a-4a43-6c9a35194a05@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:47:09 -0800
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator
On 2/12/19 12:26 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:13:39PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 03:03:08PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> Use the new for_each_of_cpu_node() helper to iterate over cpu nodes
>>> instead of open coding. Note that this will allow matching also on the
>>> node name instead of the (for FDT) deprecated device_type property.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
>>
>> I think this is going to conflict with the ELF caps changes from
>> Atish. Maybe the riscv_fill_hwcap hunk should be included in his
>> patch?
>
> Since that patch had some issues (e.g. the node reference underflow) it
> may be better to rebase it on top of this series. The changes are
> otherwise distinct after all.
>
I have fixed the node reference underflow issue and made some more
changes based on comments.
Some other patches(1,3,4,5) in this series may conflict with my series
as well. I can rebase my series on top of yours and send it as one
series if that's okay with you and Palmer.
Regards,
Atish
>> Otherwise looks good:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> Johan
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists