linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pwm: core: add consumer device link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190212090304.3j4iqj6sodtdvhr7@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:03:04 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, tduszyns@...il.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pwm: core: add consumer device link

Hello Fabrice,

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:31:37AM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 2/11/19 8:06 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 05:12:02PM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> >> @@ -943,6 +950,8 @@ struct pwm_device *devm_of_pwm_get(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np,
> >>  	if (!IS_ERR(pwm)) {
> >>  		*ptr = pwm;
> >>  		devres_add(dev, ptr);
> >> +		device_link_add(dev, pwm->chip->dev,
> >> +				DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER);
> > 
> > IMHO it's surprising that devm_of_pwm_get() does more than of_pwm_get()
> > + devres stuff. I'd put device_link_add() into of_pwm_get().
> 
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> I also agree with this. But I think this implies modifying the API for
> of_pwm_get():
>  /**
>   * of_pwm_get() - request a PWM via the PWM framework
> + * @dev: device for PWM consumer
>   * @np: device node to get the PWM from
>   * @con_id: consumer name
> 
> It seems there aren't much of_pwm_get() users currently.
> Does this look sensible ?

In my eyes this looks sensible, yes.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |