linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: fix build error redeclaration of enumerator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd8yi0u7S6oA=Vr7E9ptYdvBvXBJn=fG2kM-=vS-7oOQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:21:37 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        linux-integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ima: fix build error redeclaration of enumerator

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Commit a893ea15d764 ("tpm: move tpm_chip definition to
> include/linux/tpm.h") introduced a build error when both ima and efi is
> enabled. What happens is that both headers (ima.h and efi.h) defines the
> same 'NONE' constant, and it broke when they started getting included
> from the same file.

> We only need one of the two patches applied.

I would argue that we need two patches applied. Namespace is a hidden
issue in the code.

This patch looks good to me, FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko