lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:30:13 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.souza.org@...il.com>
Cc:     João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>,
        João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
Subject: Re: X450LCP lost abillity to turn the screen off

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:31 AM Marcos Paulo de Souza
<marcos.souza.org@...il.com> wrote:
> On 2/11/19 5:14 PM, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
> > Hello Marcos,
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 5:05 PM Marcos Paulo de Souza
> > <marcos.souza.org@...il.com> wrote:

> > You can check what is being sent by the kernel with evtest, and what
> > is being sent by X with "xinput test <device id>" (and you can find
> > the device id with "xinput list"). And you can re-map it without
> > having to rebuild the kernel using udev's hwdb. But simply re-mapping
> > should not change anything, since userspace does not act on
> > KEY_DISPLAYTOGGLE / KEY_DISPLAY_OFF. If you want to switch back to the
> > old behavior you need to revert "78f3ac76d9e5 platform/x86: asus-wmi:
> > Tell the EC the OS will handle the display off hotkey".
>
> I tried reverting the patch and only recompiling/reinstalling the
> platform/x86 modules, but the problem still happens. My next step will
> be testing agains't 4.20, since my machine was working with 4.12, so I
> might try the major releases first.

When you are going to try older releases, it would be nice to see if
LTS kernels (v4.14.y, v4.19.y from Linux stable tree [1]) behave
differently

[1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ