linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Package cstates residency info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:38:50 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@...el.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Package cstates
 residency info

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 12:34 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
<rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 12-Feb-19 3:55 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:32 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
> > <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> On 11-Feb-19 10:11 PM, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:02:33PM +0530, Rajneesh Bhardwaj wrote:

> Sure Andy, I can do as you suggest but i am confused now because on
> another patch i've got "Acked-and-tested-by" only i.e. just one single
> tag. So for consistency, what should i do? I also noticed that this tag
> is used about 59 times in Linux kernel and i even found one
> "Reported-Acked-and-Tested-by" too :) though i understand these may not
> be acceptable by all Maintainers. So, please guide.

The rule of thumb is to be closer to what you got from a person and at
the same time don't push custom (non- or rarely used) tags.
So, 59 uses seems okay to me to use that tag as is.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko