[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190212112534.GB28278@localhost>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:25:34 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [v4 PATCH 8/8] RISC-V: Assign hwcap as per comman capabilities.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:10:12AM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> Currently, we set hwcap based on first valid hart from DT. This may not
> be correct always as that hart might not be current booting cpu or may
> have a different capability.
>
> Set hwcap as the capabilities supported by all possible harts with "okay"
> status.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index e7a4701f..a1e4fb34 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/smp.h>
>
> unsigned long elf_hwcap __read_mostly;
> #ifdef CONFIG_FPU
> @@ -42,28 +43,30 @@ void riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
>
> elf_hwcap = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * We don't support running Linux on hertergenous ISA systems. For
> - * now, we just check the ISA of the first "okay" processor.
> - */
> for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> - if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node) >= 0)
> - break;
> - }
> - if (!node) {
> - pr_warn("Unable to find \"cpu\" devicetree entry\n");
> - return;
> - }
> + unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
>
> - if (of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)) {
> - pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n");
> - of_node_put(node);
> - return;
> - }
> - of_node_put(node);
> + if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node) < 0)
> + continue;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < strlen(isa); ++i)
> - elf_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[(unsigned char)(isa[i])];
> + if (of_property_read_string(node, "riscv,isa", &isa)) {
> + pr_warn("Unable to find \"riscv,isa\" devicetree entry\n");
> + return;
Did you want "continue" here to continue processing the other harts?
Note that you currently leak the device node when returning.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists