[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902121426550.3710@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:27:51 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, aubrey.li@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] x86,/proc/pid/status: Add AVX-512 usage elapsed
time
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>
> > On 2019/2/12 21:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I didn't include the first patch, because I saw it's already in tip
> > tree. Did you use tip tree?
>
> Yes, that's my bad, forgot to switch branches. That still does not solve:
>
> > > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c: At top level:
> > > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1279:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘arch_proc_pid_status’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > > void arch_proc_pid_status(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Sorry for this, May I know how to replicate it on my side?
>
> make W=1 ....
Aside of that I didn't have to compile that simply because it was obvious
that nothing includes procfs.h in that file ...
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists