[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190212142850.iwgi4n6v6oep4oin@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:28:50 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@...il.com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: hibvt: Add hi3559v100 support
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:49:27AM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
> Add support for hi3559v100-shub-pwm and hisilicon,hi3559v100-pwm
> platforms. They require a special quirk: pwm has to be enabled again
> to force duty_cycle refresh.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c
> index 27c107e78d59..bf33aa24433c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct hibvt_pwm_chip {
> struct clk *clk;
> void __iomem *base;
> struct reset_control *rstc;
> + bool quirk_force_enable;
> };
>
> struct hibvt_pwm_soc {
> @@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ struct hibvt_pwm_soc {
> };
>
> static const struct hibvt_pwm_soc pwm_soc[2] = {
> + { .num_pwms = 2 },
> { .num_pwms = 4 },
> { .num_pwms = 8 },
The members of this struct are used as of-data (in struct
of_device_id::data below). When looking at the usage:
{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-pwm", .data = &pwm_soc[1] },
{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3519v100-pwm", .data = &pwm_soc[2] },
{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3559v100-shub-pwm", .data = &pwm_soc[2] },
{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3559v100-pwm", .data = &pwm_soc[0] },
this isn't exactly easy to understand. I would prefer to do it as
follows:
static const struct hibvt_pwm_soc hi3516cv300_soc_info = {
.num_pwms = 2,
};
...
static const struct of_device_id hibvt_pwm_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "hisilicon,hi3516cv300-pwm", .data = &hi3516cv300_soc_info },
...
};
Then you could also add a member to hibvt_pwm_soc to signal if that
force_enable quirk is necessary and would not need to use
of_device_is_compatible() to determine this. The result is that you have
a description of all relevant differences in a single place.
@Thierry: Also this is yet another driver instance where a num-pwms
property would simplify the driver because up to before this patch this
was the only difference between the different variants.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists