[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190212150618.GB19188@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:06:18 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:52:53PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi Greg at al,
> > >
> > > These fix two issues on top of the recent device links material in
> > > driver-core/driver-core-next.
> > >
> > > The first one fixes a race condition that may trigger when
> > > __pm_runtime_set_status() is used incorrectly (that is, when it is
> > > called with PM-runtime enabled for the target device and working).
> > >
> > > The second one fixes a supplier PM-runtime usage counter imbalance
> > > resulting from adding and removing (e.g. in the error code path) a
> > > stateless device link to it from within the consumer driver's probe
> > > callback.
> > >
> > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
> >
> > Looks good, all now queued up, thanks.
>
> Greg, please don't get me wrong, but ~1.5 hours isn't sufficient for
> me to review/test submitted patches.
>
> I have been trying to collaborate (review/test) device links related
> code with Rafael, but what's the point if you queue up the patches,
> before I even got the change to look at them. Shall I interpret it as
> you don't care about me reviewing this, then just tell me so I don't
> have to waste my time.
As they are just in my -testing branch, I can easily drop them now if
you find problems. I didn't realize that Rafael was wanting you to
review this as they were marked as "fixes:" for previous patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists