linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/core: don't WARN for impossible rb sizes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1f71da66-4783-0108-668c-cdffca499719@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:42:38 +0800
From:   "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     julien.thierry@....com,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...el.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: don't WARN for impossible rb sizes

Hi Mark,

Looks I hit a regression issue on SKL desktop.

For example,

root@skl:/tmp# perf record -g -a
failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)

In this case, size = 1264, order_base_2 = 11, MAX_ORDER = 11

if (order_base_2(size) >= MAX_ORDER)
	goto fail;

It will goto fail directly. Is it really correct? Could you help to look 
at this?

BTW, I tested with Arnaldo's perf/core branch.

Thanks
Jin Yao

On 1/10/2019 10:27 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> The perf tool uses /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_mlock_kb to determine how
> large its ringbuffer mmap should be. This can be configured to arbitrary
> values, which can be larger than the maximum possible allocation from
> kmalloc.
> 
> When this is configured to a suitably large value (e.g. thanks to the
> perf fuzzer), attempting to use perf record triggers a WARN_ON_ONCE() in
> __alloc_pages_nodemask():
> 
> [  337.316688] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 5666 at mm/page_alloc.c:4511
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3f8/0xbc8
> [  337.316694] Modules linked in:
> [  337.316704] CPU: 2 PID: 5666 Comm: perf Not tainted 5.0.0-rc1 #2669
> [  337.316708] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT)
> [  337.316714] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO)
> [  337.316720] pc : __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3f8/0xbc8
> [  337.316728] lr : alloc_pages_current+0x80/0xe8
> [  337.316732] sp : ffff000016eeb9e0
> [  337.316736] x29: ffff000016eeb9e0 x28: 0000000000080001
> [  337.316744] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: ffff0000111e21f0
> [  337.316751] x25: 0000000000000001 x24: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316757] x23: 0000000000080001 x22: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316762] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 000000000000000b
> [  337.316768] x19: 000000000060c0c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316773] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316779] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316784] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316789] x11: 0000000000100000 x10: 0000000000000000
> [  337.316795] x9 : 0000000010044400 x8 : 0000000080001000
> [  337.316800] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff800975584700
> [  337.316806] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff0000111cd6c8
> [  337.316811] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000
> [  337.316816] x1 : 000000000000000b x0 : 000000000060c0c0
> [  337.316822] Call trace:
> [  337.316828]  __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3f8/0xbc8
> [  337.316834]  alloc_pages_current+0x80/0xe8
> [  337.316841]  kmalloc_order+0x14/0x30
> [  337.316848]  __kmalloc+0x1dc/0x240
> [  337.316854]  rb_alloc+0x3c/0x170
> [  337.316860]  perf_mmap+0x3bc/0x470
> [  337.316867]  mmap_region+0x374/0x4f8
> [  337.316873]  do_mmap+0x300/0x430
> [  337.316878]  vm_mmap_pgoff+0xe4/0x110
> [  337.316884]  ksys_mmap_pgoff+0xc0/0x230
> [  337.316892]  __arm64_sys_mmap+0x28/0x38
> [  337.316899]  el0_svc_common+0xb4/0x118
> [  337.316905]  el0_svc_handler+0x2c/0x80
> [  337.316910]  el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> [  337.316915] ---[ end trace fa29167e20ef0c62 ]---
> 
> Let's avoid this by checking that the requested allocation is possible
> before calling kzalloc.
> 
> Reported-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> ---
>   kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> index 4a9937076331..309ef5a64af5 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
> @@ -734,6 +734,9 @@ struct ring_buffer *rb_alloc(int nr_pages, long watermark, int cpu, int flags)
>   	size = sizeof(struct ring_buffer);
>   	size += nr_pages * sizeof(void *);
>   
> +	if (order_base_2(size) >= MAX_ORDER)
> +		goto fail;
> +
>   	rb = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!rb)
>   		goto fail;
>