linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the drivers-x86 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 20:45:56 +0530
From:   "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the drivers-x86 tree


On 07-Feb-19 9:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 4:06 AM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
> <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 07-Feb-19 4:27 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In commit
>>
>>    4284dc008f43 ("platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Fix file permissions for ltr_show")
>>
>> Fixes tag
>>
>>    Fixes: 63cde0c16c67 ("platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Show Latency Tolerance info")
>>
>> has these problem(s):
>>
>>    - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>
>> Did you mean:
>>
>>    2eb150558bb7 ("platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Show Latency Tolerance info")
>>
>> Yes, upstream commit is 2eb150558bb79ee01c39b64c2868216c0be2904f. For some reason when i do git show on my repo with both these SHA1 i see the same patch.
>>
>> I will fix this in next version.
> Hmm... this came to our published branch, i.e. for-next, would it be
> better to update it via rebasing?
>
> Darren, what do you think?

Hi Andy, I have corrected this in v2 anyway and i sent to upstream 
today, just in case you prefer it over rebasing.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10810123/



>