[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213163316.GB18666@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:33:16 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, PeterHuewe@....de,
jgg@...pe.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/tpm2: Extend tests to cover partial
reads
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:27:44AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 2/13/19 7:13 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 15:42 -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> >> Three new tests added:
> >> 1. Send get random cmd, read header in 1st read, read the rest in second
> >> read - expect success
> >> 2. Send get random cmd, read only part of the response, send another
> >> get random command, read the response - expect success
> >> 3. Send get random cmd followed by another get random cmd, without
> >> reading the first response - expect the second cmd to fail with -EBUSY
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
> >
> > Getting still some garbage in the output:
> >
> > $ sudo ./test_smoke.sh
> > [sudo] password for jsakkine:
> > test_read_partial_overwrite (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
> > Reads only part of the response and issue a new cmd ... ok
> > test_read_partial_resp (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
> > Reads random in two subsequent reads ... ok
> > test_seal_with_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
> > test_seal_with_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
> > test_seal_with_too_long_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
> > test_send_two_cmds (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest)
> > Send two cmds without reading a response ... ok
> > test_too_short_cmd (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
> > test_unseal_with_wrong_auth (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
> > test_unseal_with_wrong_policy (tpm2_tests.SmokeTest) ... ok
>
> Looks like python unittest prints out the docstrings:
>
> + def test_read_partial_resp(self):
> + """Reads random in two subsequent reads"""
>
> I can remove them if it makes more difficult to process the output.
Yeah, I mean it also outputs the function name, which is good enough
IMHO.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists