linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46ad3b08-b96b-6ef2-a5e4-fb0865865916@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:40:22 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, dvhart@...radead.org,
        andy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] x86/cpu: Add Icelake to Intel family

On 2/13/19 8:35 AM, Bhardwaj, Rajneesh wrote:
> I sure did, perhaps it wasn't clear in my response. I can remove
> coreboot link in next version but please clarify whether i should keep
> other link that i mentioned or just keep the commit without any link?

I think we're hearing loud and clear from the maintainers that they
prefer *public*, official documentation from Intel to back up our patches.

Barring that, they'd rather have no link than a link to some other
random project.