lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:26:14 -0700
From:   Nick Crews <ncrews@...omium.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 (chrome/wilco_ec/)

Randy,

No, I didn't test it, I'm sorry, of course I should done that.
Sorry for the formatting too, I'm new to this and wasn't sure what
tool to use. The following version of the patch was made with
"git format-patch" and now I'm replying in plaintext, it hopefully is better.

>From 0cfb3db970636983c1570827b7793e31e352716e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Crews <ncrews@...omium.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:46:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] FROMLIST: wilco_ec: Fix Kconfig dependencies

In the initial version of the Wilco EC Driver, the
dependency order was wrong. It before was possible to
select CONFIG_WILCO_EC and CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC without
having CONFIG_CROS_EC_LPC_MEC. This was wrong, since
WILCO_EC depends upon CONFIG CROS_EC_LPC_MEC, not the
other way around.

---
 drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig          | 2 +-
 drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
index 462eb9dfa4f2..b69561050868 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config CROS_EC_LPC

 config CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
  bool "ChromeOS Embedded Controller LPC Microchip EC (MEC) variant"
- depends on CROS_EC_LPC || WILCO_EC
+ depends on CROS_EC_LPC
  default n
  help
    If you say Y here, a variant LPC protocol for the Microchip EC
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
index d8e2cddb4712..de097690fce3 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 config WILCO_EC
  tristate "ChromeOS Wilco Embedded Controller"
- depends on ACPI && X86
- select CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
+ depends on ACPI && X86 && CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
  help
    If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS
    Wilco EC over an eSPI bus. This uses a simple byte-level protocol
--
2.20.1


On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:13 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 2/12/19 3:49 PM, Nick Crews wrote:
> > OK, here is the patch to fix this problem. We had the dependency backwards.
> >
> > Should I re-send out the entire patch series to the LKML with this fix in it?
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
> > index 462eb9dfa4f2..b69561050868 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ config CROS_EC_LPC
> >
> >  config CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
> >         bool "ChromeOS Embedded Controller LPC Microchip EC (MEC) variant"
> > -       depends on CROS_EC_LPC || WILCO_EC
> > +       depends on CROS_EC_LPC
> >         default n
> >         help
> >           If you say Y here, a variant LPC protocol for the Microchip EC
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
> > index d8e2cddb4712..6ea2d3f64ce5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >  config WILCO_EC
> >         tristate "ChromeOS Wilco Embedded Controller"
> > -       depends on ACPI && X86
> > +       depends on ACPI && X86 && CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
> >         select CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
> >         help
> >           If you say Y here, you get support for talking to the ChromeOS
> >
> >
>
> Nick,
>
> Did you test this?
>
> When I apply the patch (by hand, since it was whitespace-mangled/damaged),
> I get this:
>
> rdunlap@...way:linux-next-20190212> make ARCH=x86_64 O=X64 oldconfig
> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/rdunlap/lnx/next/linux-next-20190212/X64'
>   GEN     Makefile
> scripts/kconfig/conf  --oldconfig Kconfig
> drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig:84:error: recursive dependency detected!
> drivers/platform/chrome/Kconfig:84:     symbol CROS_EC_LPC_MEC is selected by WILCO_EC
> drivers/platform/chrome/wilco_ec/Kconfig:1:     symbol WILCO_EC depends on CROS_EC_LPC_MEC
> For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
> subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ