[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190213175415.GA11635@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 09:54:15 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
CHANDAN VN <chandan.vn@...sung.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] RISC-V: Free-up initrd in free_initrd_mem()
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 09:38:36AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> memblock_free() is has no real effect at this point, no idea why arm64
> calls it.
Looks like the call was added fairly recently by:
commit 05c58752f9dce11e396676eb731a620541590ed0
Author: CHANDAN VN <chandan.vn@...sung.com>
Date: Mon Apr 30 09:50:18 2018 +0530
arm64: To remove initrd reserved area entry from memblock
which claims it is to work around the initrd being displayed in
/sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved.
I really think we need to have common behavior there - either do this
for all architectures or none. I've just sent a series that
consolidates all but a handful of the free_initrd_mem, so implementing
any common behavior on top of that would be good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists