lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:25:09 -0800
From:   Tim Chen <>
To:     Subhra Mazumdar <>,
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <>
Subject: Re: Gang scheduling

On 2/12/19 6:57 PM, Subhra Mazumdar wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> On 10/12/18 11:01 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
>> On 10/10/2018 05:09 PM, Subhra Mazumdar wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I was following the Coscheduling patch discussion on lkml and Peter mentioned he had a patch series. I found the following on github.
>>> I would like to test this with KVMs. Are the commits from 38d5acb to f019876 sufficient? Also is there any documentaion on how to use it (any knobs I need to turn on for gang scheduling to happen?) or is it enabled by default for KVMs?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Subhra
>> I would suggest you try
>> without the load balancing part of gang scheduling.
>> It is enabled by default for KVMs.
> I applied the following 3 patches on 4.19 and tried to install a KVM (with
> virt-install). But the kernel hangs with following error:
> kernel:watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#21 stuck for 23s! [kworker/21:1:573]
> kvm,sched: Track VCPU threads
> x86/kvm,sched: Add fast path for reschedule interrupt
> sched: Optimize scheduler_ipi()
> The track VCPU patch seems to be the culprit.
> Thanks,
> Subhra

Thanks for giving it a try.  Peter is working on a new version.  So I'll not try
to debug this patchset for now.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists